Egypt jeopardizes USA Plans in Middle East

Ironically, USA is presently pushing against the will of the Egyptian People, by restlessly defending the Muslim Brothers, and by trying to restore their power, despite the ugly offenses this group is practicing in Egypt, against the civil people, the military, the governmental buildings and institutes, the infrastructure of the country and its National Security!

USA support of democracy changed dramatically in Egypt to support militia groups came to power a year ago by a non clear election results! Some say that a deal was struck then by USA and Muslim Brothers, in which the latter promised to establish a peaceful environment to Israel on the Gaza and Sinai borders!

When the Muslim Brothers came to power, it was crystal clear that they were building their own political, military and social system. They repeatedly deprived other political groups to share with them a new system or regime. The Muslim Brothers through their expelled President Mursi, also refused any other party or individual to be an integral part of this new regime, outside their own party except their closest allies.

This led to  massive manifestations, and almost half the population of Egypt occupied the streets to demonstrate their strongest rejections to the President and his party the Muslim Brothers.

The Egyptian Army understood the message of the people and offered to be an intermediary between the people and the President and his party.

However, the President refused to change any of his previous bills and decisions, and chose to face the opposition with his party by any means.

The Egyptian Army gave a week to the President to listen to the voice of people and solve the crisis before it comes ugly. When this warning was completely rejected, the Army expelled the President and appointed a temporary Acting President who in turn selected a temporary Government with a sole purpose to re-write the Constitution by neutral legislators, to reach a general election and eventually election of a new president.

The Muslim Brothers rebelled violently in the streets of the country, and started to attack the civilians and military soldiers and attack every government and police building.

More-over, suddenly a serious spread of arms appeared in the hands of the Muslim Brothers, and they are using in street fights against the police and military units as well as the civilians, what is causing several victims dead and injured every day.

This is a brief picture about what is happening now in Egypt.

On the political side, the world was split in opinions between pro and against the step that was taken by the Army.

Surprisingly USA and Europe were the strongest opponents to the Egyptian Army and the strongest supporter to the Expelled President and his party the Muslim Brothers.

Well this is also surprising in the sense that USA and Europe are "supposedly" against the Muslim Brothers and their allies who are fighting the Assad Regime in Syria side by side with the Free Syrian Army. And because of them USA and Europe are hesitating to supply the Free Syrian Army with sufficient weaponry that can allow them to balance the military arms with the Syrian Army.?

This can be a real puzzle. But let us dig more and see why USA is doing what is doing in the Middle East. Or in other words; why they want the Middle East always a shaky land, like what is happening in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and now Egypt.

To be able to answer this question, we have to understand it first. And to understand it we have to look at what USA wants in the Middle East? Then immediately we can see the word Israel pops out.

When USA spoke during the War on Iraq about a New Middle East, it seemed then that such plan was ready, but interrupted when Obama came to power?

With Obama's second term, it looks that this plan can be safe to be "tried", since Obama can be blamed personally if it failed.

And it seems that the Plan is based on the a assumption that the people in the Middle East are all religious extremists or at least 70% of them!

And on the assumption that those extremists are split into Sunnis and Shiites, and they will have eventually enough political, geographical and demographic space to fight upon.

And on the assumption that those extremists can come to power and be able to control the other extremists from Al Qaeda and other similar sects.

And on the assumption that Iran and Hezbollah will be engaged negatively with those new rulers in the territory and calm down on Israel.

And on the assumption that if all the above assumptions are realized, then "supposedly" Israel will enjoy Peace with the neighboring countries including Lebanon.

It seems that the USA plan with its assumptions, was working fine till a month ago, when in few days the Egyptian Army together with the Egyptian People expelled the Muslim Brothers' President, and crack down on all Muslim Brothers leaders and their established civil commotion quarters in the streets of Cairo.

Yesterday, the Egyptian Army Leader, Abdel Fattah Sisi, clearly said that the USA's threats in cutting their military and economic supports on Egypt will mean nothing and will not make the Egyptian People Back Up.

Well, this may prolong the instability in Egypt and can mean more bloodshed!! However it also means that USA has its first slap on the face, and the Arabs need only someone to slap first and they will take it from there...

This reminds me of the USA strategy of the so called "Arab Spring". It started in Tunis and then spread to Libya, Syria, Egypt etc... And proved to be a complete failure to the people who came to power after the "Spring" and also to the USA and its supporters, because they are not able till now to control what they have created.

(May be this can make understand why Iraq is still a messy state!)

But would this be a promising success to the other countries that are opposing the USA plans in the Middle East? Or a promising success to the Egypt?

Or would this be a cause to a direct war between the super powers?

Or a war between Israel and Egypt?

Or a war between Iran and its neighboring Gulf countries?

Or a war between Hezbollah and Israel?

Or

Would this be a step for a new understanding of the American Administration, to the Arabs mainly and to the Muslims in general and also to the Christians in the Middle East?

I certainly hope so, because I feel that if USA stops igniting the threads of discrimination, and stop playing on the religious differences, they can at least gain from the territory. So far they are in a complete loss.

Sami Cherkaoui

Era Of Many Faces To Rome And Nero

On a sunny day Nero burnt Rome...

 

 Great Fire Of Rome

His mother Agrippina, was exiled by her brother emperor Caligula.
Her uncle Claudius brought her back, after he took hold of the empire and married her.
Agrippina poisoned Claudius and Nero became the emperor at age of 16.
Nero few years later murdered his mother.
He wanted to destroy huge parts of Rome, so he would be able to build his dream palaces.
When the Senate rejected his plans... He burnt down most of Rome.

 

 Nero's Torch

Well, how this reminds me of the present days.
How many Nero(s) we see today, and how many Rome(s)
And how many different history books we read every day.

How many other forms of Nero have been evolved; Rulers, Leaders of Opposition Parties, Resistance Movements etc... All willing to burn half of the planet so they can feel secured.
How many countries and states are burnt today like Rome... By Nero(s)

 

 Pakistan

Perhaps for different reasons....but same disaster.

Since this life began on earth, every now and then there were different Nero(s).

Most of them burnt countries for reasons of power and religion.

Recently, they all live in the same time....
What is ironic that all Nero(s) of these days; call them the contradicted powers, are united to destroy and burn places cities, countries..
Each Nero for its own devilish reasons and desires.

Darfur

So, what are the roots of all these Rome(s) and Nero(s)?
Why (Rome) has to be burnt continuously without any serious attempts to extinguish the fires?
Why (Nero) has to keep the fires on, no matter how long it takes, how many places it wipes out and how many lives it kills.

 

Iraq

What is the value of civilizations?Where are their norms?
What is the value of human life?
What is the extent of its cost?

Lebanon

Who buys and sells human lives?
What is the price of people?
Who have those trading rights?
What is the real price of peace in local and international markets?

Gaza

Who put these estimates?
Do they have the real knowledge that enable them evaluate Lands and People?
When they decide to sell Lands and People, to whom and why?

Syria

When Nations would decide to wake up and decide to turn all tables upside down and take their matters in their own hands?

Will there be a time when we can see Nero(s) vanish and Rome(s) flourish?

Who can answer these question?

Sami Cherkaoui

Western Labs preparing for new Genocides?

 I read today an article by Saad Mehio, (a political analyst and recognized intellectual thinker) in which he pointed to a window opened by Archbishop Francisco Chimoio of Mozambique, several years ago when he accused some Western political Labs in preparing massive Genocides against the people of Africa, so they can easily be replaced by the White Race.

The Archbishop at that time did not stop at that statement, but put more controversial dialogues on this aspect when he declared that he has in his possession documented information about two European countries who are already injecting "Condoms" with a virus that can cause AIDS sold to Africa, with the intention of killing as much as possible of African population.

And it seems, however, that not only Archbishop Chimoio who talked about this.

Thabo Mbeki, the President of South Africa doubted "Western" information that linked AIDS to defect in the immune system, and inclined to believe that the medications prescribed for AIDS' Virus might be more poisonous than AIDS itself.

The author wondered whether this can be true?

An Absolute Genocides by spreading killer viruses?!

Then he confirmed that this is not only true, but goes in time to a long history started when the English scientist Sir Francis Galton used the expression "Eugenics" in 1883. After that there was a race between scientists, politicians and militaries in Europe, towards achieving two simultaneous targets: purifying and developing the "White Superior Race", and destroying or eliminating "other minor races" which also include all "Non White Race" and the "Whites" that are suffering from heretic diseases and/or mentally retarded.

The spiritual father of Eugenics was Thomas Robert Malthus who was born in Britain 1977 and who later delivered from Charles Darwin Theory of Population another Theory; “Survival for the fittest". Malthus was so possessed with the idea of destroying all "Minor Elements" (especially the Poor) from Population, and he suggested a series of "preventive" measures against such "Elements" to stop it from controlling the "Superior Elements".

Malthus called to make the streets of the poor sectors narrower, and jam poor people in their houses to ease epidemic spreads. He also called to build the villages near swamps, and deprived the poor from medication, and "Killing Children"! He said “It is a necessity that all children who we do not need to preserve the required number of population must die"!

The "Malthusians", and leaders of Eugenics held between 1905 and 1933, several conferences in Europe and USA, with the participation and financing of famous celebrities such as Harriman and Rockefeller. Some conferences endorsed the establishment of secret and non-secret Labs, for the purpose of "improving the Human Race".

A world map showing countries by fertility rate

In the International Eugenics Conference, that was held in New York city in 1932, the issue of "increasing numbers" of the African American population and other minor races, was discussed, and one solution was decided. To lift the danger that threatening the Superior Race: The Minor Race must be sterilized and eliminated.!

Adolf Hitler came to start the elimination of the Non "Aryan" Race, which was followed by series of Racial Genocides in Europe and USA. This was supposed to end by the end of Hitler; however it was developed under a new name "Population Control"!

Who is behind this now?

The writer named some names that supported this movement; Averell Harriman, Al Rockefeller, Prescott Bush (Grand Father of George Bush) and William Draper who were the most distinguished financers of the Eugenics. Their breed now are following their steps, and very active on ways and means to reduce the world population by at least 2 billion people.

Draper worked in Eisenhower Administration in the fifties and he recommended then that the evacuation of the Non White poor countries from its population is a necessity! He explained that the population growth of such countries which are more than 2 thirds of the world is in his opinion a major threat to the National Security of USA?!

In 1968 sons and grandsons of those celebrities established “Club Rome”, under the leadership of the famous Italian Masonic  Aurelio Peccei, and the finance of Al Rockefeller. The Club published in 1972 its famous report " Growth Limitation" and Later " Global 2000" report.
Both reports put a human and scientific mask on the ugly face of Eugenics.
One of the participants in issuing the reports was the USA ex Defense Secretary Robert  McNamara, who clearly declared that " "The biggest element which must move the US foreign policy is the growth of world's population, because the threat from such growth is very similar to the threat of nuclear wars.!!

His fellow member Zbigniew Brzezinski, was more frank in demanding a forceful stop to the growth of population in the Third World.

But, how it is possible to reduce the "Third World" population?

One way is convincing the poor countries to apply “The One Child” method, which is being applied in China.

Or force. 
Not only by spreading epidemic diseases, and polluting drinking waters or manipulating the genes. But also by using the two faces of wars... General and Civil!!!!!

In the early seventies, the former US Secretary Henry Kissinger asked at that time the "office of population issues" in the foreign ministry, to prepare a study on the Demographics of South and Central America and Africa.

The report then was the basis of engineering "Civil Wars" in those countries. Which caused indescribable famine, death and agonies?

At that time the American Administration appointed two Generals who were members in the “Draper Committee of Population Crisis”; Maxwell Taylor and William Westmorland, as Chief leaders of US Forces in Vietnam.

The two Generals did all what they were asked to do "Population-wise": Using the "Orange Poisons", and the enriched Uranium to destroy in full all life circumstances, in many Vietnamese sectors mainly in the green areas.

They also paved a wide way to genocides operations either by means of US Air bombardment or by using elements like the Cambodian war lord Pol Pot who killed around 25% of his people.

Archbishop Chimoio and President Thabo Mbeki were not crazy as described by one of the United Nations’ official, when they spoke about the conspiracy of African Genocides, along with other peoples of the Third World.
The target is now clear and big: Evacuating these regions from their original inhabitants to re-inhabit them with the "White Superior Rave" and re-control their natural treasures and diminish the Third World population almost by half.

It seems Adolf Hitler was not alone the most serious criminal in the Western Contemporary history.
End of Saad Mehio Article

N.B

Probably the Middle East now is the next phase of this operation.
We can note millions killed so far since the wars started to erupt starting in 1948 when whole Palestinian population killed or kicked to be replaced by Israelis that came from Europe and America.

Then followed by 1956 Suez war, 1967 war, 1973 war, the Iran Iraq war, the 1982 Israel Lebanon War, The Lebanese Civil War, the first and second invasion of Iraq, the invasion of Afghanistan and the Sudanese Civil War.

Then the number of people killed in the so called Arab spring in Tunis, Libya, Egypt, Syria and still counting…..

Sami Cherkaoui

Re-writing Middle East with different pens

Perhaps what is going on now days in the Middle East region is a bold attempt to divide it into multiple administrations and Geo-political entities.

This exactly what happened after the first world wars, however the methods are absolutely different and so are the international agreements and disagreements, albeit the goal is the same, and that is dividing the territory into many squares, each administered by a different administration and intention, but all of them unite on the idea of division.

With a quick view on how the "World" dealt with the Region before, we can clearly see how they are re-writing the history of this "sensitive" region.

After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, a New Middle East was born, but with tremendous struggles in the region between the creators and also amongst the inhabitants themselves.

The United Nations which was newly established after WWI, and was called at that time The League of Nations, granted France and Britain the authority to each control, administer and manage territorial lands in the region. In that sense France controlled Syria and Lebanon. Iraq, Jordan and Palestine were given to Britain.

As soon both countries assumed their management and control, a hidden intelligence war erupted between them, and a sharp rejection to military occupation rapidly rose.

However that rejection was rapidly turned to vast religious wars between Christians and Muslims of the same people.

This is exactly what is happening today, despite all sorts of disguising this matter. What differs today that the internal conflict between the same people is not only between the Christians and Muslims, but also between the different Muslim Sects and the different Christians sects... each of them against each other,

In the past, when the people were engaged with their religious and political fighting, and all the chaos that was spread all over the lands, the League of  Nations were able to eliminate a whole country called Palestine at that time and replaced it with a new country called Israel.

The Occupiers (France and Britain) rushed to "give" the occupied countries their "Independence" to absorb the wrath of people, and control their responds and reactions on such devastating action. Also to create a calm situation around the new-born state,

It is true that the Occupiers left the Arab states, however they left behind a chain of regimes that worked under their control and supervision.

The Regimes that ruled the states worked to lengthen their ruling era more than they worked on development and prosperity of their countries.

This poor administration of the New Rulers gave lucrative nature to the Intelligence wars between the late Occupiers which was never calmed, but to the contrary spread and erupted more than ever.
The region began to see series of "military coups" and more rulers toppled and new rulers came to rule,,, till the people of Egypt revolt against their King "Farouk" in 1952 and a new Era began with President Nasser who completed the revolution task and took back Suez Canal from the French and the British.

This action put Israel in Jeopardy. So the three states (France, Britain and Israel) declared war against Egypt in 1956, but was not supported as it should, by the United States. USA at that time had a different Agenda, and was emerging as a new rich and strong power, and wanted to befriend the Arab Gulf rulers when oil discoveries in their lands were announced. USA also was the sole creditor of the three states together, after being almost bankrupted after WW2.

Egypt won the war and resumed control on Suez Canal and its revenues.

Later in 1967 USA supported Israel to win territories in Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Israel took Jerusalem and made it the Capital of Israel. Also took Golan Heights in Syria, and most of Bilad Al Sham was under its surveillance. It also took Sina and secured its South front. 
However, it failed to secure passage to its trade through Suez Canal.

In 1973 President Sadat gave Israel that passage and more, with a historic Peace Pact between Egypt and Israel.

USSR was not happy in leaving Egypt to USA, so immediately Syria (which was depending on USSR military and economic support) with a push from USSR, refused this Peace Pact and aided the Palestinian Jihad against Israel. Lebanon became an open battle field due to PLO military strong existence in the country, which was supported by President Assad of Syria.

Later and till today, Syria supported Hezbollah of Iran to control most of Lebanon's political Agenda.

USA worked systematically in the region to eliminate all dangers that are surrounding Israel. It declared war against Saddam Husein, because he was no more trusted as a "Peaceful Tyrant" and failed in a test with Kuwait.

It occupied Afghanistan to control the spread of "Sunni Extremists" and use this with their political and military dispute with Iran.

It supported the topple of Bin Ali in Tunis and Qaddafi in Libya by their own people, however it left the people to handle a bigger struggle with each other.

It permitted the topple of Mubarak in Egypt, but left Egypt with a new experience that is threatening to make Egypt weaker, and ready to accept any sort of solution for stability.

One of the solutions would not be a surprise if it is Suez Canal.

What is going on in Syria today, may be considered as a tough revenge against Assad himself, because he did not completely go along with USA plans in the region and perhaps tried to take more than what he was supposed to have. 
USA probably does not wish to give Lebanon as a price to Assad after his strong support to Iran and Hezbollah.

Hezbollah today is a strong card to Iran, and a wild card to USA. 
Assad lost the "privilege" to be that wild card.

All what is going on today in the Arab countries is actually a bloody dialogue between Iran and USA, (with Europe against USA “full success” from behind the scenes).

The problem with USA is that it is repeating the same political and diplomatic methods every time, in its handling of the Middle East Issue.

And the problem with Middle East leaders is that they never learnt those methods and are always trapped and eventually fail. They are always victims to their immature political experiences. Sadly they take their people with them when they fall. And the people pay the real price.

Sadly, it does not really matter to USA what will happen to Egypt and Syria, or how long their agonies take. Because USA, is almost the only international country, which has a physical existence in the heart of the Middle East: militarily (in Afghanistan and Israel), Politically (In Iraq and Israel) and economically (In Arab Gulf States and Israel).

The longest times Syria and Egypt remain in their agonies, the best it is for Israel. Because both countries are the direct powers that can give real threats to Israel.

The question of Hezbollah in Lebanon can be solved and probably all Hezbollah would be dissolved with an understanding between Iran and USA.

The Panoramic View on the region is getting clearer, and we can almost see the divided states.

Also we can see a more secured Israel and more weak Arab States and a more stable Iran.

Except... if Russia is able to be a tougher player against USA in the region...

So far Russia is playing on the ropes, and is more an Acrobat than a serious opponent.

Sami Cherkaoui